Explore / Draft & revise

What should change—and what must stay yours?

Get a useful first pass without losing the point of the piece.

10 records

Prepared 16 Sept 2026 · original source dates retained

Sudowrite's staged outline tools and Notion AI's blended prompts show two different vendor answers to where assistance starts.

3 min · source-led record↗

Both vendors document a tone or rewrite feature that changes register, not claims, a narrower job than full drafting.

3 min · source-led record↗

OpenAI, Anthropic and ProWritingAid document different training and retention rules depending on which product tier is used.

3 min · source-led record↗

Word's documentation shows tracked changes record a self-entered name, with no built-in category for AI-generated edits.

3 min · source-led record↗

OpenAI and Notion each instruct users to check generated text against sources before treating it as finished.

3 min · source-led record↗

Google's and Microsoft's documentation show version history records timing and access, not whether text was AI-generated.

3 min · source-led record↗

APA requires a methods-section disclosure, while WAME's recommendations ask for the prompts and dates behind the drafting.

3 min · source-led record↗

ProWritingAid's own pages frame its Virtual Beta Reader report as feedback before human readers, not a substitute for one.

3 min · source-led record↗

DeepL's benchmark page cites reduced post-editing, and KDP's rule keeps a machine translation AI-generated after edits.

3 min · source-led record↗

Elicit's and Scite's documentation describe sentence-level citation records that a claim ledger practice would draw on.

3 min · source-led record↗