The Copyright Office says digital replicas need federal law
Part 1 of the Copyright Office's AI report recommends a federal right against unauthorized digital replicas, leaving other issues to later parts.
Explore / Rights & disclosure
Follow the original policy or decision. Keep its date and jurisdiction attached.
Retained source records, not legal advice. Check current primary documents and qualified advice for your jurisdiction and circumstances.
No matching record. Try fewer words or reset the filters.
Part 1 of the Copyright Office's AI report recommends a federal right against unauthorized digital replicas, leaving other issues to later parts.
The pre-publication Part 3 report says AI training can be fair use for research but not for commercially competing output.
The Copyright Office's March 2023 guidance requires applicants to disclose and exclude AI-generated material from what they claim.
KDP's living content guidelines require disclosing AI-generated text, images and translations but not AI-assisted editing or brainstorming.
Apple's own formatting guide requires an AI Generated by attribution distinct from a human author credit.
B&N Press requires authors to declare AI-Created versus AI-Assisted work, using terms that do not match Amazon's or Apple's.
Kobo's blog and content policy say it won't feed books into an LLM while barring content generated primarily by automated tools.
From 2 August 2026 the AI Act requires marking some AI-generated content, on top of copyright duties already binding AI model providers.
ICMJE, COPE and WAME each state AI tools cannot meet authorship criteria because they cannot take responsibility for a manuscript.
AP and Reuters both bar generative AI from creating news imagery while allowing it as production infrastructure elsewhere in the newsroom.
The Authors Guild's 2023 complaint against OpenAI targeted how books entered a model, not just what a chatbot outputs.
A 2026 summary-judgment motion asks the court to decide fair use as a matter of law, not send it to a jury.
Bartz v. Anthropic found training fair use but ruled downloading pirated books was not, sending only that question to trial.
Anthropic's piracy settlement pays class members by title, but only for books the Copyright Office shows were registered on time.
Kadrey v. Meta found for the platform not because copying was harmless, but because these plaintiffs did not prove market dilution.
A federal court upheld the Copyright Office's refusal to register a work whose applicant claimed no human involvement at all.
Zarya of the Dawn kept copyright in its text and layout while the individual Midjourney images lost protection entirely.
The Times sued OpenAI and Microsoft over chatbots it says both trained on and reproduced its journalism nearly verbatim.
A federal panel consolidated twelve author, publisher and news suits against OpenAI into a single New York proceeding.
An Authors Guild survey found members reporting that publishers often failed to register the copyrights AI settlements now require.